Phra Luang Phor Ngern Wat Bang Klan Pim Yai BE2543 Code 316 Nur Newa Loha (109 baht gold Phra Phichit model)

December 14, 2024

Phra Luang Phor Ngern (Lp Ngern) • Pim Yai • Nur Newa Loha + 109 Baht Gold

BE2543 • Wat Bang Klan • Code 316 • “Phra Phichit Edition” model • (财佛龙婆银 / 招财挡险)

Phra Luang Phor Ngern (Lp Ngern) Wat Bang Klan Pim Yai BE2543 Code 316 Nur Newa Loha with 109 baht gold Phra Phichit model

财佛龙婆银 Wat Bang Klan 佛历 2543（collector caption）/ Phra Luang Phor Ngern (Lp Ngern) Wat Bang Klan Pim Yai BE2543 Code 316 Nur Newa Loha with 109 baht gold “Phra Phichit Edition” model

View Biography (Luang Phor Ngern • Wat Bang Klan)

Collector Lens

Pieces associated with Luang Phor Ngern carry a special “household name” status among Thai collectors—especially in lines that emphasize prosperity and protective luck. This BE2543 “Phra Phichit Edition” model sits in that modern commemorative tradition: a carefully planned casting project that tries to honor the Wat Bang Klan legacy through sacred metallurgy, structured ceremonies, and coded numbering. In Thai–Chinese collector circles, it is often described as a “wealth Buddha” (财佛) type—language that reflects devotional intention and cultural reverence, not guaranteed outcomes.

Amulet Information
Name: Roop Lor Luang Phor Ngern Pim Yai 109 baht gold Phra Phichit model
Monk: Mass Chating
Temple: Wat Bang Klan
Year (BE): 2453
Material: Nur Newa Loha
Type: Roop Lor (portrait)
Condition Note: Not available
Price: SGD 188

Historical Background (Edition Narrative)

The “Phra Phichit Edition” is described as a carefully crafted project spanning BE2542–2543 (1999–2000), designed to commemorate the enduring legacy of Luang Phor Ngern. In collector records, this kind of “edition narrative” matters: it tells you how the project frames its materials, how the casting was conducted, and how the consecration was organized across multiple ceremonies.

Material & Craftsmanship

Metals and sacred blend: The edition narrative states a blackened Nawa metal base, infused with 109 baht of gold (symbolically matching Luang Phor Ngern’s age in that telling), and a prepared set of 95 sacred ingredients (total blend weight noted as 32 kilograms before the gold infusion).
Casting method: Described as an old Thai “soil-pouring / foundry” approach, valued for durability and structural integrity. Two surface categories are also mentioned: a raw “fire-finished” group (599 pieces) and a standard finished group (1,999 pieces), each with numbering logic.

Sacred Ingredient Set (Primer Summary)

The narrative describes a large “heritage blend” approach—mixing fragments and relic-metals linked to Phichit and broader Thai amulet history, including old coins, bell metals, and consecrated remnants from well-known lines. In collector practice, such lists are treated as “edition claims” unless accompanied by official documentation; still, they explain why this edition is presented as a serious, material-forward commemorative.

Consecration (Ceremony Framework)

The edition narrative states five large consecration ceremonies involving 169 monks, with multiple rites at Wat Bang Klan and concluding ceremonies at Wat Tha Luang, including an overnight rite dated 6 February BE2543. From a collector lens, “multi-ceremony consecration” is a hallmark of major commemorative projects in modern Thailand.

Traditional Spiritual Attributes (Belief Framing)

Devotees often associate Luang Phor Ngern lines with a blend of wealth support (โชคลาภ/ค้าขาย) and protective fortune (คุ้มครอง/แคล้วคลาด). The Thai–Chinese caption provided (“招财挡险”) expresses the same intention: attracting favorable conditions while avoiding harm. These are cultural belief claims—most collectors pair them with merit-making, discipline, and right action.

Prosperity support: often framed for business flow, opportunity, and stability.
Protection: commonly described as “avoid danger / deflect bad luck” in everyday life.
Respect & reputation: a “presence” quality collectors sometimes attach to iconic monk lineages.

Collector Anecdotes (Non-Instructional)

The provided narrative includes a “field-test” style anecdote describing misfires when the item was tested, presented as faith-confirming evidence. In documentation writing, this is best recorded as a belief story rather than a reproducible claim—valuable as cultural texture, not as a guarantee.